Summary #1
“Sons and
Lovers: A Psychoanalytic Criticism”
The article entitled “Son and Lovers: A Psychoanalytic
Criticism” references not only from one novel but speaks of the similarity between
sons and lovers and Hamlet. Reason being, is that the subject of Oedipus complex
is present in both novel; this is where a male (usually the son) harbors deep feeling
towards his mother. The review is based on the theory of Sigmund Freud and
human development. This is then turned and completely linked to behavioral
patterns from the main character of the mentioned novels; Oedipus complex. This
summarizes Paul’s and William’s behavior to their mother and the troubles that
come with the subject. Even after William and Paul both enter into a relationship,
they feel conflicted due to their Oedipus complex. They compare the women in
their lives to their mother but they both become frustrated and angered;
feeling hopeless because their lovers were not their mother.
Summary #2
Chris Semansky
In this essay, Semansky considers Lawrence's
novel as a Bildungsroman
In this review, Semansky talks about the author of
sons and lovers, D.H Lawrence as being linked to Paul who is a character of his
novel. It describes the hardship and difficulty of Paul in his dysfunctional
family; a mother who he harbors feelings for and a father he cannot seem to accept
along with his three sibling; his older brother, William who is conflicted with
Oedipus complex as himself. Semansky reveals his thought of the novel being
Bildungsroman, an autobiographical novel. He also feels that Lawrence’s novel was
inspired by the early events in his life. Paul who is the narrator, is engrossed
in life around his mother that he becomes infatuated with her and seeks to
further pull her away from his father grasp.
Questions:
Why do the children hate Walter?
What has his actions caused?
How important is Paul’s relationship with his mother?
Does he regret her views?
No comments:
Post a Comment